Trading inside the lines: Is it time to review your securities trading policy?

  • Insider trading continues to be a focus of ASIC’s surveillance initiatives.
  • This article contains important considerations when preparing or reviewing your company’s trading policy.
  • The trading policy must apply to KMP but may also be extended to employees, family members and entities closely connected to KMP who have access to inside information.

Corporate worker facing stocks on computer screen

A listed entity must have a securities trading policy governing the trading in its securities by key management personnel, and containing minimum information requirements under ASX’s Listing Rules.1 In 2015, ASX revised it guidance on trading policies2, providing a number of recommendations (in addition to the mandated requirements under the Listing Rules) for boards to consider when preparing or reviewing their company’s trading policy.

The underlying policy objective for having a trading policy is to regulate the trading of securities by senior executives and directors of an entity (because they have direct access to information which would not generally be available to investors). The aim is to reduce exposure to, and avoid the appearance of, insider trading and market manipulation.

Set out below is some guidance for listed entities (and entities intending to apply for admission on the ASX) on what to consider in adopting or updating a trading policy by answering the queries we commonly receive from companies in the process of updating their trading policy.

What is insider trading?

Insider trading is prohibited by the Corporations Act 2001.3 It occurs where a person, either by themselves, or through another person, trades in certain financial products such as shares while in possession of inside information. ‘Inside information’ includes any information that is not generally available and, if it was generally available, a reasonable person would expect it to have a material effect on the price of the traded financial products.

Trading policies are always subject to the overarching prohibition against insider trading even if a person receives clearance to trade in securities, whether or not under exceptional circumstances, or trading falls within an exception under the policy.

What are the consequences of breaching the insider trading provisions?

Breaches of the insider trading provisions can give rise to serious civil and criminal liability, including harsh financial penalties and imprisonment. By way of example:

  • in 2016, Sydney stockbroker, Oliver Curtis, was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment after being found guilty of conspiring to commit insider trading (allegedly making a total profit of approximately $1 million)
  • more recently, former oil and gas executive, Steven Noske, was found guilty of insider trading (allegedly making a total profit of approximately $51,000), was sentenced to 18 months’ imprisonment and was ordered to pay a $10,000 good behaviour bond and a $20,000 fine.

Insider trading continues to be a focus of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) surveillance initiatives, particularly as the development of its surveillance technology increases.

This article is exclusive to Governance Institute members and subscribers.

To read the full article…

or Become a member